The "Panama" blog

Latest tripe from "Scuttle's Corner.

 

E.Mail link above

 

This is a response from the blog owner, commenting on a response I made to a post in the actual blog and claiming I "provoked them".

On Blog poll

Personal attacks - Lies

Blogposts page 1

Blogposts page 2

Blogposts page 3

blogposts page 4

Chatango not on "Ned" - So they say

On my YouTube Videos

There are lots of good things on the internet, but also, sadly many things which can be put to bad use. One of these is the online blog with chatbox, both of which have examples owned by that web behemoth GOOGLE. They claim to offer "free speech". This is almost entirely under ANONYMOUS logins which appear to be beyond redress. They organise attacks on other web users, usually with no foundation other than an often misguided "opinion", a bias, or simply nothing more than bullying, pure and simple.

There are a few examples on the page below. I might add that these proclaimers of "free speech" often BLOCK the people they are abusing from responding in "chatango", so how can they profess fairness at all?

I am often totally blocked from posting in their "shitbox" (they called it that) but they carry on producing crap supposedly about me.

Many of them post as Anon in the chatango and then go and post in the very channels they are slagging off. That is cowardly and below the belt. It is no wonder that broadcasters are stressed, their enjoyment ruined and possibly more. Such duplicitous behaviour is shameful and cowardly. They even complain when "guest" option is shut off in some channels. Look what it says at the top of the Chatterbox below! They do EXACTLY what it says not to do in their box everywhere they post!

786

Recently a poster in the "shitbox" rejoicing under the name "monkeysniffer" (say no more) posted a blog entry with images of my face crudely edited into images of Gary Glitter. I posted a reply to it (as is my right) Mr Scuttle posted the rubbish below. He does NOT allow me to reply to it there, so here it is.

I do not have, and have never had any IP tracker software.

He said

Damnit Nedrauk. You keep forcing yourself up into the blogs and then you cry about it.

I reply

**How exactly did I do that? "monkeysniffer" (stupid name) posted a blog entry - I replied to it. Somebody, possibly you, stopped me posting in the "shitbox".

I am blocked from posting in the "shitbox" when I post almost anything there. "Anons" claim to know my IP address when I post as an anon (To try to get a fair hearing on topics they raise there.) "Anons" CANNOT see IP adresses, so what is going on?

He said

What's wrong with you?

I reply

**I seriously wonder what is wrong with you. You post BS in the "shitbox", sometimes apparently as an anon, but won't let people respond to it. (or a hidden moderator does.)

He said

Are you proud of your fetish for young boys and want everyone to know, but then don't?

I reply

**Not quite sure what that line is supposed to say. Use of the word "young" is deliberately misleading.

I have no such "fetish". Again the McGregor lie is used. I run a fitness portal site and was asked to include bodybuilding. That allows members to show progress etc. Almost all are or were already on the internet. (Hence the term "portal"). Advice is mostly from members, to their peers.

He said

If you had half a brain you'd keep your big mouth shut and stop baiting bloggers.

I reply

**How, exactly have I been "baiting bloggers"? Anonymous dopes post crap about driveways, solar panels, (using out of date photos as supposed "proof") etc. on a daily basis. They lurk in my channel and FT's channel.

I remind you that my comment was to a blog post which appeared out of the blue.

He said

We all KNOW why you like looking at young, near naked boys.

I reply

**Again you make an incorrect assumption. He refers here to the original lie by "Mr McGregor"

He said

You even told us that you were a homosexual teacher that helped with sports.

I reply

**I happened to own weights gear at the time - The school did not.

He said

**1 (shower room eyeballing?) **2 Cut the bullshit Ned and delete the "inappropriate" video's on Youtube.

I reply

** 1 Another untrue allegation. I did not go near the showers to look at the students. In any case, the students were "sixth form" and 16 and older.

I reply

**2 If the "Alex" video is "inappropriate" why has nobody said so? All of them are either on Youtube in other places, or are compiled from other Youtube videos or bodybuilding sites.

On rare occasions it was necessary to go through the changing rooms - That was a result of the design of the building at the time. It happened when the gym was used for examinations. Supervisors had no other access.

 

This Page created March 04 2015. Edited March 21st 2015