Ridiculous Assumptions.
E.Mail link above	SOME EXCERPTS FROM A PARTICULARLY VINDICTIVE BLOG

There are lots of good things on the internet, but also, sadly many things which can be put to bad use. One of these is the online blog with chatbox, both of which have examples owned by that web behemoth GOOGLE. They claim to offer "free speech". This is almost entirely under ANONYMOUS logins which appear to be beyond redress. They organise attacks on other web users, usually with no foundation other than an often misguided "opinion", a bias, or simply nothing more than bullying, pure and simple.

First Page Here. Second Page Here.

Google and other searches online are being deliberately misread by posters in both the blog proper and what they describe as "the crapbox".

The blogmaster states:-	I comment.
No spamming, abuse, or personal information . Remember, this is your blog. Your place to say what you think. Anon's are welcome here. If you wish to do a post SEND IT IN. Have fun and safe blogging.	The chatterbox and crapbox regularly include abusive statements and have included my address and phone number. Why do they allow posters to do that as "Anons"? "Safe blogging" indeed - HIDING so you can post crap.

QUESTION. Do you think it's inappropriate from a homosexual male of advanced years (late 60's) to be uploading images of naked, or semi naked 14, 15, 16 and 17yr old boys?

I have not uploaded naked images of that nature. I do not search for such images. I have a fitness site open to those age groups - A portal for sharing information. Members are allowed to show progress images if they wish to.- mostly upper body. Most have already posted images elsewhere. I have no other interest in those images.

The second sentence below is totally inaccurate!
Now can you type in your search. "Nedrauk boys." and "Nedrauk gay" and see what it finds. It should look like this. (see the example below) You'll note that some of the sites Nedrauk has downloaded images and others he's uploaded from.	There is no validity whatsoever in that statement. Proof follows below this. Anyone searching on the internet does NOT do so by using a nickname they happen to have on a site. IF they search logged onto that site, then it would be the case. The examples below however show my videos have been included in playlists by other Youtube members - That is ALL they show!

Nedrauk tells us he's doing nothing wrong and if he really believed that then why has he been deleting images? Anyways. Put in a search and if YOU believe he's breaking the law then please contact your local police department with what incriminating evidence you have.

Where am I supposed to have been deleting images from? An entire site entry has been removed and partly re located. I am not responsible for the content of playlists owned by others if that is what is being referred to. None of the material you have is "incriminating"

Another foundless statement
As Nedrauk isn't qualified in weight lifting, or any other type of fitness instructing and as he has no "reasonable explanation" for his site, we can only assume the worst.	Is every webmaster on the internet "qualified" in that manner? By the way "weight lifting" is a different sport entirely. I have never claimed to be qualified and have only given safety and very basic material to members - Most of it has come from other actual site members. The site is effectively an information portal for them.
How do you explain that sites such as Virgin Fitness approached me to carry their links and that Google also allows the site to carry their advertising?

The First "search evidence"

Note that the first two are YouTube playlists, neither are owned by "nedrauk". The first begins "by nedrauk 53,555 views but the actual video title is missing. The rest is irrelevant This is the actual playlist. It is owned by Julian SGRojas http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL7B4BD291C3542092 The second includes ...by nedrauk 53,599 views with also no video title. The rest is again irrelevant This is who owns the playlist. - Carloseljuli page muscle videos http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=5AFA518116035B33 Both refer to the same videos of "Steven" who featured well over 10 years ago. One of the videos. "Steven Talks" (he is full of himself) The second one. "Steven Poses" (I actually edited this version) Third and fourth are blog generated, as are many "nedrauk" search results.The bloggers claim to find "search evidence" which their own entries have generated!

Comment on the posts to the left. 1 I resent anonymous posted lies passed off as "opinions". If the comment refers to the "privacy" of the anonymous posters, that is a pathetic argument. 2 Logging on with 2 accounts to test chat etc and to avoid confusion does not count as tabbing - That refers to multiple opening of a channel without logging onto it as a user. The neighbours know about the camera. 3 I was not fired from the school and did not "perve on the boys in the change room" That is libel 4 The "fight" began in Frank Taylor's channel. That letter is not a fake. I was not fired 5 I am not, and the site "prooves" nothing - especially of that nature. Libel again 6 Those "searches" referred to are pointing to playlists owned by others which include one of my videos which those persons have watched.

Comment on the posts to the left. 1 The site is not and has never been a "pedophile site" and I would not even wish to be friends with such people! 2 LOL That was NOT me! The post was hastily removed by Scuttle, and he commented on it at the time. Not before I took a screen capture of it (see here) 3 Those "searches here show PLAYLISTS I have nothing to do with and had no knowledge of! 4 I called Microsoft once for an essential product key. Ant other "calls" have been FROM scammers. 5 Every time I go online the crapbox (your name not mine) starts up - often sending a member over to stir things. I have given proof of "blog involvement" here and elsewhere. Yes, others can be involved as well, but many do stem from the blog chat boxes. As to viruses etc - That is a non starter. The "cyber bullies" are mostly the "anons" in the crapbox

This is when my personal information was posted in the "chatterbox" contrary to the TOS of Chatango and against the statement which then appeared at the top of the blog itself. Anon 9918 was not my login at that time. Scuttle (the owner) himself posted about the TOS violation and deleted the posts made. I regard any post of my address in either chatterbox or crapbox as breaches of the same TOS. Some persons (anons) do know the information, but it is not (should not) be posted anywhere on the internet.

I can't work out what the first entry is supposed to show - The subject of the search (at yahoo! it seems) is missing. I did research on YT and found "fede" who had his own channel and site. The amount of ..... makes it impossible to tell what the rest was. The last 3 refer to videos at YouTube.

This anonymous post is typical. The newly located site is incomplete and is very hard to update fast as FTP access does not work. I have not even been allowed to respond to the chatterbox on more than one occasion, so how on earth can I be the bully?

I have known Dylan and Jared for a long time. Dylan because he helped me and others with broadcasting issues and because he was, even then an administrator and helped with trolls etc. In some cases I helped him as well - by combatting trolls in his channel. Jared came to Frank Taylor's channel with computer and camera issues. We helped him out. Jared has a big interest in weather, which I also share as a Geography Degree holder. We swap observations etc on weather conditions - He usually being the one who contacts me. In neither case has there been anything more to it As to the comment from Mizz "collecting all that shit". The fitness site has been around over 15 years, so the content reflects that. There is NO other reason for the site than to allow the members to say what routines, diet and exercises they used, with or without visual examples. Youtube does not have the facility to exhange such information

If the website had been a blog type system (It began before they existed) members would have been able to post text and images directly as users can do on blogger. The only way they could contribute at the time was by sending to the webmaster (me). There was never, ever any "demand" for anything and NO mention anywhere of speedos.

The members on the sportachievements site (the Russian one) were mostly in pose suits as it is a bodybuilding and gymnastics site. It also sold videos of the members - in the same age range as my site. That site was one reason why I set mine up - I also shared info with the students at the school and some staff. At no time was there any "sharing of pics with pedophiles" as anon 1326 states.

Nedrauk said...   Facts   1 I did not order and have NEVER ordered a pizza or any other fast food.   2 I did not "admit to tabbing my broadcast". I have seen ppl in chatterbox saying they were doing it as it happened. The maximum number of logins I have done is three. All on different user names. Those were to test chat issues on different computers. THAT IS ALL.   Oh Why do you insist on being ANON?

Sep 1, 2013, 3:25:00 PM  Anonymous Anonymous said...   ned why do insist on coming into a blog where u started the war and no one likes u because of ur lies u have told here about the pizzas and tabbing and yes u did admit to tabbing ur own cast because u said in one of ur casts that u cant tab ur own cast while using Xsplit but u deleted that video as u know dylan would get a copy of it The war with Frank Taylor and all so called "puppets" associated with him had been going for weeks before I entered the chatterbox. As a mod there I resented the way his chat was being interfered with, mainly by persons from the chatterbox. They were boasting about it in the "chatterbox" and the blog was attacking Frank as well. I did not lie about ordering a pizza. I NEVER, EVER ORDER FAST FOOD! See the last entry below. I do not need to order such food and minimum order value would be far in excess of what a single person would eat. I said that it was not possible for anyone to "tab" whilst using Xsplit with screen regions selected without it being obvious within the broadcast. That did not mean I was "doing it and couldn't". The video highlight showing that is still extant.   ned i would like to ask u a serious question but i allready what what ur answer would be but heres the question "why do u blame the people in this blog for some of the stuff that happens in ur cast why cant it be one of ur viewers who is logged into ur cast chatting to u thats causing the trouble there for u" There are instances of other parties interfering by tabbing but I have seen anons and others in the chatterbox log at the time boasting about what they were doing - ordering taxis, food and even a skip. It was all in the chatbox logs..   i know what ur answer would be ned as ur a cyber bully and a liar u blame other people for what u have done in urt cast like tabbing and ordering pizzas for ur self and say u didnt do it Refer to the post above.

Sep 1, 2013, 4:39:00 PM Blogger Scuttlebutt said...   Ned. You typed: I did not "admit to tabbing my broadcast" and then you said: " The maximum number of logins I have done is three. All on different user names."   Isn't that a contradiction and an admission of guilt? You did not mention the rest of the sentence. i.e. "All on different user names. Those were to test chat issues on different computers. THAT IS ALL." By "tabbing" I refer to 10, 20 and more anonymous "tabs" which cause the viewer numbers to fluctuate wildly. One reference in the chatterbox log even stated which browser was best for doing it. See below. "Anon2521 get 100 going." "Anon1692 Recently closed on Chrome is great"

Sep 1, 2013, 4:47:00 PM  Anonymous Anonymous said...   ok ned heres the go i like to be anon because of people like u who LOVE to stalk other people and cause trouble for them like ur trying to do with scuttlebutt i have seen people like ur self ned come and go because people like u cause trouble u have upset a few people here in this blog and u have upset a few people that use to go to ur cast u wonder why people dont go to ur cast heres one huge hint "all u do is whing about this blog all the time in ur cast and how bad the blog is making ur casting experience" well if u dont like this blog dont come here dont make mention of it and dont blame any one from this blog if something happens in ur cast Read above.   and the tabbing u have said during one of ur casts that u cant tab like u did before because Xsplit wont let u tab ur own cast for some unknown reason and dont say u didnt say that or say wheres the proof u know what u said and u know u have tabbed and u admited u used ur other computers to bring in other user names so to me thats classed as tabbing and thats what u r guilty of I said it was impossible for anyone to tab when using Xsplit screen regions without it being obvious to anyone viewing the broadcast. "All on different user names. Those were to test chat issues on different computers. THAT IS ALL." is what I actually said. I regard "tabbing" as multple opening of non logged in anonymous connections   ned u r not a IT technician i checked u out u never did a IT course and if u were a IT technician why do u call microsoft for technical help? I worked on a school network, picking up all I needed to know actually on the job, and in some cases before I actually began the job. That did not involve any of the more esoteric techniques which gamers use such as overclocking etc as they were simply not required. That included building computers when on one occasion a colleague who WAS doing courses went through two motherboards before I realised that extra mounting points in the case were shorting out the boards! There were also numerous occasions where the network manager had to share knowledge with others and where I also shared my "on the shop floor" knowledge. I called Microsoft once for a software code!   Sep 1, 2013, 9:16:00 PM

Chats

This Page created 1st September 2013 Updated 23rd December